Burnind video DVD's

by **Anguis** » Fri Feb 29, 2008 5:23 pm

4.0GHz quad on liquid cooling

the new penryn can probly do 4.0 on air with unlocked multiplier

and the number of applications which are putting to use 4 cores is growing every day. new games, new apps, encoding, decoding video, music, etc, all take advantage of the extra cores (if you are using decent software)
in a year, quad core will be completely mainstream, as there are quad cores already selling in normal retail stores (most accessible to the general public)

by **cheese** » Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:29 pm

what the fuck does cypher and anguis know about new computers anyways? You two poor fucks still connect to Prodigy to get to the internet.

by **RED** » Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:00 am

cheese wrote:what the fuck does cypher and anguis know about new computers anyways? You two poor fucks still connect to Prodigy to get to the internet.

i thought they made the leap to nutsrcape?

or was it AOL?

anywho, to whoever is saying go dual core, i agree. if you're bent on a quad-core, WAIT.

wait till prices come down and more apps/programs are developed for them

by **Anguis** » Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:05 pm

Dont include me in there Dave. I had DSL in the beginning of 2000, and now
<a href='http://www.speedtest.net' target='_blank'><div class='bbimg'>

</div></a>

yeah.

by **~BoS~Cypher** » Mon Mar 03, 2008 4:49 pm

Anguis you just said Quad is failure by saying water cooling. Extra money on bullshit when the Penryn could do it on air. Q6600 is a good deal but meh, we are talking about speed. Oh and Cheese fuck you, lol, I remember trying to play Mame on my old POS. 500mhz Great Success!

by **Anguis** » Tue Mar 04, 2008 1:18 am

~BoS~Cypher wrote:Anguis you just said Quad is failure by saying water cooling. Extra money on bullshit when the Penryn could do it on air. Q6600 is a good deal but meh, we are talking about speed. Oh and Cheese fuck you, lol, I remember trying to play Mame on my old POS. 500mhz Great Success!

i would water cool a dual core too, makes no difference. can get over 3GHz with the q6600 on air anyway.

by **jalapeno** » Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:40 am

anguis, i cannot comprehend your sentence.

by **Anguis** » Wed Mar 05, 2008 10:04 am

Anguis wrote:
~BoS~Cypher wrote:Anguis you just said Quad is failure by saying water cooling. Extra money on bullshit when the Penryn could do it on air. Q6600 is a good deal but meh, we are talking about speed. Oh and Cheese fuck you, lol, I remember trying to play Mame on my old POS. 500mhz Great Success!

i would water cool a dual core too, makes no difference. can get over 3GHz with the q6600 on air anyway.

For cow's sake:
If I bought a new computer with a dual core processor, I would still overclock it using liquid cooling. I can over-clock a Q6600 Quad Core Processor to 3.0GHz with just air cooling as well.

by **~BoS~Cypher** » Thu Mar 06, 2008 9:19 am

but we can get to 4.0ghz on air with the Penryn. haha

by **Anguis** » Thu Mar 06, 2008 5:27 pm

~BoS~Cypher wrote:but we can get to 4.0ghz on air with the Penryn. haha

Penryn's aren't even out yet..

by **~BoS~Cypher** » Mon Mar 10, 2008 8:56 am

wow u lose pal, lets do some more research.

by **Anguis** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 7:09 pm

post some links then. not on newegg/tigerdirect

by **~BoS~Cypher** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 9:01 am

How could you say they are not out when they are being sold on Newegg? They are also available retail from Dell, Hp, and Others.

E8400 and E8500 are Penryn

<a href='http://img175.imageshack.us/my.php?image=yamf0.jpg' target='_blank'><div class='bbimg'>

</div></a>

by **jalapeno** » Wed Mar 12, 2008 10:45 am

who gives a shit about penryns, post some PR0N

by **[da]serial killer** » Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:13 am

or at least a link to ripped burning software that is compatible with Vista

but i am satisfied with the porn non the less